Effectiveness and Safety of Bivalirudin During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Real World: CARTAGOMAX Study

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

The CARTAGOMAX study assessed the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin during real-world cardiac intervention. This was a single-center prospective study. Patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were anticoagulated with bivalirudin alone or unfractionated heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Propensity score matching was performed to control for baseline imbalances and yielded 1168 patients. There was lower incidence of the composite outcome of death from any cause or major bleeding at 30 days (P = 0.005), 6 months (P = 0.005), and 12 months (P = 0.001) of follow-up in the bivalirudin group, compared with the heparin plus glycoprotein inhibitor group. The administration of bivalirudin was associated with lower rate of all-cause mortality at 1 year of follow-up (P = 0.009). The incidence of major bleeding was lower in the bivalirudin group at 1, 6, and 12 months of follow-up (P = 0.002, P = 0.013 and P = 0.017, respectively). The incidence of stroke and reinfarction were similar between groups during follow-up. The rate of stent thrombosis were slightly higher in the bivalirudin group, without reaching statistical significance at 1 and 12 months of follow-up (P = 0.06, P = 0.04, P = 0.07 at 1, 6, and 12 months, respectively). The CARTAGOMAX study found that the use of bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with lower incidence of the composite outcome of death from any cause or major bleeding during follow-up. The use of bivalirudin was associated with similar rates of stroke, reinfarction, and stent thrombosis compared with heparin plus glycoprotein inhibitor. Bivalirudin proved to be a safe and effective anticoagulant during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles