There is Little Evidence That Other Clinical and Conventional Radiographic Features are Better Than Minimal Buccolingual Expansion for the Diagnosis of Nonsyndromic Keratocystic Odontogenic Tumor

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Article Title and Bibliographic Information

Keratocystic odontogenic tumor: systematic review.

Article Title and Bibliographic Information

MacDonald-Jankowski DS.

Article Title and Bibliographic Information

Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40(1):1–23.

Reviewer

Punnya V. Angadi, BDS, MDS, DNB

Purpose/Question

To determine if there are other clinical or conventional radiographic signs available to improve the diagnosis of keratocystic odontogenic tumors compared with using minimal or no buccolingual expansion alone

Source of Funding

Information not available

Type of Study/Design

Systematic review

Level of Evidence

Level 3: Other evidence

Strength of Recommendation Grade

Grade C: Consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series for studies of diagnosis, treatment, prevention, or screening

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles