RF11 The association between different measures of depression and subsequent major cardiovascular events

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Background

Associations between depression and cardiovascular disease have been reported in a number of studies. However, in many of these, the results have not been adjusted for potentially important confounding factors. With the large amount of data collected, the UK Biobank offers a unique opportunity to investigate to what extent different measures of depression remain independent risk factors for major cardiovascular events (MCVE) after controlling for a number of potential confounding factors.

Methods

We used data from 275,759 UK Biobank participants without a history of cardiovascular diseases and major mental disorders other than depression who had complete data available. In primary analyses, depression was defined as one or more of self-reported depression, antidepressant use, or hospital admission for depression. In secondary analyses, the effects of each of the subcategories of depression were analysed separately. MCVE were defined as first-ever fatal or non-fatal stroke or myocardial infarction ascertained from hospital admission and cause of death records. We performed Cox Proportional Hazards models to estimate the risk of MCVE among participants with depression compared to those without depression. Fully adjusted models included measures of age, sex, ethnicity, education, income, area-based deprivation, body mass index, alcohol intake, physical activity, smoking, homeownership, fruit and vegetable consumption, oily fish intake, and family history of stroke, heart disease, hypertension and/or depression.

Results

We identified a total of 21 842 (7.9%) participants with depression at baseline. During a median of 6.7 years of follow-up, an incident MCVE occurred among 326 participants with depression and 3718 participants without depression. In fully adjusted models, hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for MCVE were 1.13 (1.01–1.27) for participants with any indication of depression, 1.14 (1.00–1.31) for participants with self-reported depression, 1.60 (1.18–2.17) for participants with history of a hospital admission with depression, and 1.12 (0.99–1.27) for participants reporting antidepressant use. Similar patterns were observed when stroke and myocardial infarction were used separately as outcomes.

Conclusion

All measures of depression remained independent risk factors for MCVE after adjustment for a variety of potential confounding factors and effect estimates were similar for all sub-categories of depression. The adjusted hazard ratios should only be interpreted causally if one assumes that the covariates are common sources of depression and MCVE. This assumption remains controversial. Future studies should apply more advanced statistical methods in order to determine the effect of lifestyle factors as potential mediators and explore potential for interactions.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles