Fenestrated Stent-Graft Repair: Which Stent Should Be Used to Secure Target Vessel Fenestrations?

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid



To investigate in an in vitro model the ability of different covered and uncovered stents to resist displacement/migration of a fenestrated stent-graft.


Three different types (2 covered, 1 bare) of commonly used 7-mm balloonexpandable stainless steel stents (Jostent, Advanta V12, and Palmaz Genesis) were investigated in a testing rig consisting of 2 overlapping tubes with 2 sets of 7-mm holes representing bilateral renal artery fenestrations and ostia. The rig was attached to a tensile tester via pneumatic clamps. The stents were deployed without flaring to 7 mm through the overlapping holes. The rig was moved apart at a constant rate of 12 mm/min up to a maximum displacement of 6 mm; force versus displacement values were recorded while stent deformation was observed. Tests were repeated at least 6 times for each stent type at room temperature. The median force required to cause a 25%, 50%, or 75% reduction in cross-sectional area of the bilateral “renal artery” stents was determined.


The median force (interquartile range) required to cause a 50% reduction in crosssectional area of identical bilateral “renal artery” stents securing fenestrations was 25.1 N (8.1) for a covered Jostent, 9.3 N (0.9) for a covered Advanta V12 stent, and 7.5 N (0.7) for a bare Palmaz Genesis stent. The differences were statistically significant (p<0.01) between stents at each of the 3 levels of cross-sectional area reduction.


There is a significant difference in the ability of different commercial “nondedicated” stents to withstand a crushing force when deployed within endograft fenestrations, which has important implications for clinical practice.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles