Mathematical Discrepancies of the Tono-Pen Applanation Tonometer

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Purpose of the Study:

The purpose of the study was to determine if Tono-Pen tonometers use simple average and coefficient of variation (CV) algorithms to calculate intraocular pressure (IOP).

Material and Methods:

IOPs were measured as part of routine ocular examination in 152 client-owned dogs. Using 11 Tono-Pen’s, a total of 778 averaged readings were collected. Individual IOP readings, and average IOP and CV displayed by the instrument, were recorded. Average IOP and CV were then manually calculated from individual readings and compared with those displayed by the instrument.

Results:

The mean absolute difference between the calculated and displayed average IOP was 1.37±2.01 mm Hg (P<0.001). In 6% of cases, the calculated average IOP was 5 to 15 mm Hg different from the displayed average IOP. The difference between the displayed and calculated average IOP was significantly higher in hypertensive eyes with displayed IOP≥25 mm Hg. Calculated CV was equal to, lower than, or greater than displayed CV in 28.6%, 1.5%, and 69.7% of cases, respectively. In 17.6% of cases, calculated CV was >20%, but displayed CV was <5%. Receiver operating characteristic analysis could not correlate number of individual IOP readings with magnitude of difference in average IOP.

Conclusions:

Calculated average IOP and CV differ significantly from values displayed by the instrument, especially at higher IOPs. A difference of ≥5 mm Hg between calculated and displayed average IOP seen in 6% of cases may impact clinical judgement. Displayed CV<5% does not correlate with accurate IOP measurement based on individual results.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles