Journal of Medical Ethics. 43(6):353–358, JUN 2017

DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103930

,  

PMID: 28137999

Issn Print: 0306-6800

Publication Date: 2017/06/01


Share this on facebook   Share this on Twitter   Share this on LinkedIn   Email this article  



Print

The role of religious beliefs in ethics committee consultations for conflict over life-sustaining treatment

Julia Bandini;Andrew Courtwright;Angelika Zollfrank;Ellen Robinson;Wendy Cadge;

+ Author Information


    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that individuals who identify as being more religious request more aggressive medical treatment at end of life. These requests may generate disagreement over life-sustaining treatment (LST). Outside of anecdotal observation, however, the actual role of religion in conflict over LST has been underexplored. Because ethics committees are often consulted to help mediate these conflicts, the ethics consultation experience provides a unique context in which to investigate this question. The purpose of this paper was to examine the ways religion was present in cases involving conflict around LST. Using medical records from ethics consultation cases for conflict over LST in one large academic medical centre, we found that religion can be central to conflict over LST but was also present in two additional ways through (1) religious coping, including a belief in miracles and support from a higher power, and (2) chaplaincy visits. In-hospital mortality was not different between patients with religiously versus non-religiously centred conflict. In our retrospective cohort study, religion played a variety of roles and did not lead to increased treatment intensity or prolong time to death. Ethics consultants and healthcare professionals involved in these cases should be cognisant of the complex ways that religion can manifest in conflict over LST.

Related Topics

        loading  Loading Related Articles