Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

In this response, we first tackle what we take to be the core disagreement between ourselves and Hammersley, namely the justification for our model of social research ethics governance. We then consider what follows from our defence of governance for ethics review and show how these claims attend to the specific concerns outlined by Hammersley.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles