Between- and Within-Observer Agreement for Expert Judgment of Peak Flow Graphs From a Working Population

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Expert judgment of peak flow-time graphs provides an important tool to detect occupational asthma. This technique has mainly been used in clinics to evaluate reversible airflow obstruction and to assess potential work-related patterns. The reproducibility of this technique in an open working population is unknown. Agreement between and within nine experts was studied using peak flow-time graphs of 49 potato-processing workers. All graphs were classified into four categories by the nine experts, while seven experts read ten graphs at two occasions. Thirty-four graphs (69%) were classified as "no airway obstruction" while four graphs (8%) showed "work-related airway obstruction." There was only slight agreement between the nine experts; mean Cohen's kappa (κ) was 0.19. Agreement within experts was moderate; mean κ was 0.47 for judging graphs twice. Our results suggest that in a "healthy" working population, judgment of peak flow graphs is not a favorable method for detection of airway obstruction. If this technique is applied in epidemiological studies, judgment of the graphs should be done by more than one expert.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles