Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 55(7):802–808, JUL 2013

DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31828b22cc

,  

PMID: 23787569

Issn Print: 1076-2752

Publication Date: 2013/07/01


Share this on facebook   Share this on Twitter   Share this on LinkedIn   Email this article  



Print

Agreement Between Fixed-Ratio and Lower Limit of Normal Spirometry Interpretation Protocols Decreases With Age: Is There a Need for a New GOLD Standard?

Marek Mikulski;Alicia Gerke;Spencer Lourens;Thomas Czeczok;Nancy Sprince;Anthony Laney;Laurence Fuortes;

+ Author Information


    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Objectives:To assess concordance between the fixed 70% ratio cutoff point with the fixed percent predicted values (Fixed-ratio) and the lower limit of normal (LLN) algorithms in interpreting spirometry results in an older population.Methods:Spirometries were interpreted using Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey reference equations for 2319 workers.Results:The Fixed-ratio algorithm characterized 34.5% (n = 801) results as abnormal, compared with 29.7% (n = 689) by the LLN. There were almost twice as many obstructive and mixed airways spirometries identified under the Fixed-ratio compared to LLN. Rates of restrictive pattern physiology were virtually the same under each algorithm. Overall agreement between the algorithms decreased with age from “almost perfect” for those younger than 60 years to “substantial” for those older than 80 years.Conclusions:This study found age-related discordance between two algorithms possibly related to the lack of reference equations and standards for individuals older than 80 years.

Related Topics

        loading  Loading Related Articles