Positive effects of aggressive vasodilator treatment of well-treated essential hypertensive patients

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid


Increased systemic vascular resistance and coronary microvascular dysfunction are well-documented in essential hypertension (EH). We investigated the effect of additional vasodilating treatment on coronary and peripheral resistance circulation in EH patients with high systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) despite well-treated blood pressure (BP). We enroled patients on stable antihypertensive treatment that were given intensified vasodilating therapy (ACE inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor blocker or calcium channel blocker). Before and following 6 months of intensified therapy, coronary resting and maximal artery flow were measured by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography to calculate coronary flow reserve (CFR) and minimum vascular resistance (C-Rmin). Cardiac output was estimated by inert gas rebreathing to calculate SVRI. Maximal forearm blood flow was determined by venous occlusion plethysmography to calculate minimum vascular resistance (F-Rmin). Patients were assigned into two groups: high-SVRI and low-SVRI subgroups, based on a median split at baseline. Following additional treatment SVRI decreased more in the high-SVRI group than in the low-SVRI group (14.4 vs - 2.2%: P = 0.003), despite similar baseline ambulatory BP (132/81 mm Hg) and BP reduction (6.5 and 4.6%: P = 0.19). F-Rmin remained unchanged (6.5 vs - 2.0%: P = 0.30), while C-Rmin decreased by 22 and 24% (P = 0.80) and CFR increased by 23 and 17% (P = 0.16). Thus, intensified vasodilating therapy improved SVRI more in patients with high SVRI than in those with low SVRI. Regardless of SVRI status, the treatment improved cardiac but not forearm dilatation capacity. The substantial improvement of the hypertensive cardiac microvascular dysfunction was not related to the reduction in SVRI.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles