Evaluation of free thyroxine determination based on one-step fluorometric immunoassay technique and the suboptimal concordance with two-step immunoassay

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid


HIGHLIGHTSAIA 900 system is suitable for routine diagnosis purpose.AIA 900 was validated according to French protocol.Low concordance between AIA900 and Access 2 immunoassays is reported.Various clinical contexts may challenge the quantification of FT4.Free thyroxine (FT4) quantification is continuing to be a concern. The purpose of the following study was to evaluate the analytical performance of Tosoh AIA900 based on a one-step technique and its comparison to Access 2 (two-step technique) over different clinical contexts (euthyroid, thyroid disorders, uncontrolled diabetes, renal failure and pregnancy). The protocol established by the French society of Clinical Biology was used to evaluate: imprecision, limit of detection, trueness, linearity, interferences and method comparisons. Within-run variation of 3.1%, 5.7% and 4.4% were found for the low, medium and high controls, respectively. Between-run was 5.8% for low control, 5.7% for medium control and 7.1% for high control. Common interferences did not affect one-step immunoassay FT4 results. The linearity was checked up to 86pmol/L. The limit of detection was 5.5pmol/L. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) showed a low agreement (0.6) between both methods. Bland-Altman plot revealed that AIA 900 one-step immunoassay technique provides a significant higher values ((+2.8±2.7pmol/L;p<0.0001). The Passing-Bablok regression demonstrated both proportional and systematic differences in comparison to Access 2. The lowest association was noted in subjects with impaired renal function (CCC=0.27). At the time of the study, the results of on-step immunoassay are not directly comparable with Access 2.

    loading  Loading Related Articles