Neurodevelopment of Infants with and without Craniofacial Microsomia

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid


ObjectivesTo determine whether infant cases with craniofacial microsomia (CFM) evidence poorer neurodevelopmental status than demographically similar infants without craniofacial diagnoses (“controls”), and to examine cases’ neurodevelopmental outcomes by facial phenotype and hearing status.Study designMulticenter, observational study of 108 cases and 84 controls aged 12-24 months. Participants were assessed by the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition and the Preschool Language Scales-Fifth Edition (PLS-5). Facial features were classified with the Phenotypic Assessment Tool for Craniofacial Microsomia.ResultsAfter adjustment for demographic variables, there was little difference in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition or Preschool Language Scales-Fifth Edition outcomes between cases and controls. Estimates of mean differences ranged from –0.23 to 1.79 corresponding to standardized effect sizes of −.02 to 0.12 (P values from .30 to .88). Outcomes were better among females and those with higher socioeconomic status. Among cases, facial phenotype and hearing status showed little to no association with outcomes. Analysis of individual test scores indicated that 21% of cases and 16% of controls were developmentally delayed (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.29-1.61).ConclusionsAlthough learning problems have been observed in older children with CFM, we found no evidence of developmental or language delay among infants. Variation in outcomes across prior studies may reflect differences in ascertainment methods and CFM diagnostic criteria.

    loading  Loading Related Articles