Corrections to Lynch and Cohen

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid


Reports an error in the original article by John G. Lynch, Jr., and Jerry L. Cohen (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978[Oct], Vol 36[10], pp. 1138–1151). Published here are three corrections to symbols, equations, and/or sentences appearing on pages 1140, 1143, and 1146. (The following abstract of this article originally appeared in record 1980–05406–001.) Proposes a modified subjective expected utility formulation as a model for better understanding helping behavior. Two experiments designed to test the usefulness of the proposed formulation are reported: In Exp I, 11 male and 14 female undergraduates had to react to variations of 3 scenarios of helping situations, reporting the likelihood of their giving aid; in Exp II, 34 Ss responded to a more complicated variation of one of the scenarios, telling how bad they would feel if they did not stop to help. Results of Exp I support the assumption that the probability (P) and utility (U) of a given consequence combine multiplicatively. Results of Exp II question the assumption that the P × U products for different consequences combine additively. These results suggest, instead, that a product averaging and more specifically a differential-weighted product averaging, may provide a more accurate descriptive model. The implications of such a model for understanding human helping behavior are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)

    loading  Loading Related Articles