Comparison of Three Accelerated Pulse Sequences for Semiquantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Sensitivity Encoding Incorporating Temporal Filtering (TSENSE)

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid


Purpose:To investigate the parallel acquisition technique sensitivity encoding incorporating temporal filtering (TSENSE) with three saturation-recovery (SR) prepared pulse sequences (SR turbo fast low-angle shot [SR-TurboFLASH], SR true fast imaging with steady precession [SR-TrueFISP], and SR-prepared segmented echo-planar-imaging [SR-segEPI]) for semiquantitative first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging.Materials and Methods:In blood- and tissue-equivalent phantoms the relationship between signal intensity (SI) and contrast-medium concentration was evaluated for the three pulse sequences. In volunteers, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and normalized upslopes (NUS) were calculated from signal–time curves (STC). Moreover, artifacts, image noise, and overall image quality were qualitatively evaluated.Results:Phantom data showed a 40% increased linear range of the relation between SI and contrast-medium concentration with TSENSE. In volunteers, TSENSE introduced significantly residual artifacts and loss in SNR and CNR. No differences were found for NUS values with TSENSE. SR-TrueFISP yielded highest SNR, CNR, and quality scores. However, in SR-True-FISP images, dark-banding artifacts were most pronounced. NUS values obtained with SR-TrueFISP were significantly higher and with SR-segEPI significantly lower than with SR-TurboFLASH.Conclusion:Semiquantitative myocardial perfusion imaging can significantly benefit from TSENSE due to shorter acquisition times and increased linearity of the pulse sequences. Among the three pulse sequences tested, SR-TrueFISP yielded best image quality. SR-segEPI proved to be an interesting alternative due to shorter acquisition times, higher linearity and fewer dark-banding artifacts.

    loading  Loading Related Articles