Effect of run vs combined cycle/run training on JOURNAL/mespex/04.02/00005768-199312000-00013/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T222403Z/r/image-pngO2max and running performance

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

MUTTON, D. L., S. F. LOY, D. M. ROGERS, G. J. HOLLAND, W. J. VINCENT, and M. HENG. Effect of run vs combined cycle/ run training on VO2max and running performance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 25, No. 12, pp. 1393–1397, 1993. The effects of 5 wk of equivalent intensity, 85–90% maximum heart rate (MHR), run-only (N = 6) vs cycle/run (N = 5) training were evaluated in moderately fit runners, mean JOURNAL/mespex/04.02/00005768-199312000-00013/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T222403Z/r/image-pngO2max of 55.2 ml.kg-1.min-1, 19–35 yr old, on maximal treadmill (TM) and cycle ergometer (CE) testing, 5000-m and 1609-m run performances, and submaximal measures while treadmill running. Subjects participated in either 4 d.wk-1 of run-only or alternating run and cycle training. Both groups significantly improved TM JOURNAL/mespex/04.02/00005768-199312000-00013/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T222403Z/r/image-pngO2max (P < 0.05), CE JOURNAL/mespex/04.02/00005768-199312000-00013/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T222403Z/r/image-pngO2peak (P < 0.01), and 5000-m (P < 0.01) and 1609-m (P < 0.05) run times with no significant differences between the groups. The TM JOURNAL/mespex/04.02/00005768-199312000-00013/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T222403Z/r/image-pngO2max pre/post values were 55.3 ± 3.0 to 58.2 ± 3.0 and 55.6 ± 3.8 to 58.9 ± 2.4 ml.kg-1.min-1 for the run group and cross-trained group, respectively. Posttraining submaximal treadmill running showed statistically significant pace increases of 18.7 (run) and 16.1 (cycle/run) m.min-1 with similar heart rate, blood lactate, and RQ values as pretraining. Results indicate that 5 wk of either mode of training can significantly improve aerobic capacity and run performance.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles