Comparison of cardiopulmonary responses to forward and backward walking and running

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid



Backward running has long been used in sports conditioning programs and has recently been incorporated into rehabilitative settings as a method of increasing quadriceps strength while decreasing the joint compressive forces about the knee. Although backward locomotion has been studied kinetically, the metabolic cost of backward walking and/or running has not to our knowledge been previously characterized. Oxygen consumption and other cardiopulmonary variables were measured under constant speed exercise during backward and forward walking at 107.2 m·min−1 and during backward and forward running at 160.8 m·min−1. Peak oxygen consumption (JOURNAL/mespex/04.02/00005768-199401000-00019/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T222405Z/r/image-pngO2peak) was also measured during maximal incremental backward and forward running. JOURNAL/mespex/04.02/00005768-199401000-00019/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T222405Z/r/image-pngO2, HR, and blood lactate were significantly higher (P < 0.001) during backward walking and running than during forward walking and running. During backward walking and backward running, subjects exercised at 60% and 84% of their forward JOURNAL/mespex/04.02/00005768-199401000-00019/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T222405Z/r/image-pngO2peak, respectively. In conclusion, for a given speed, backward locomotion elicits a greater metabolic demand and cardiopulmonary response than forward locomotion. In general, these data suggest that while undergoing rehabilitation, an injured athlete may continue to exercise using backward walking/running at an intensity sufficient enough to maintain cardiovascular fitness levels.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles