Possible role of dopamine D1-like and D2-like receptors in behavioural activation and evaluation of response efficacy in the forced swimming test

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Based on the different effects of the dopamine D1-like and D2-like receptor antagonists SCH 23390 and raclopride on the measures of licking microstructure in rats ingesting a sucrose solution, we suggested that the behavioural activation of reward-associated responses depends on dopamine D1-like receptor stimulation, and its level is updated, or “reboosted”, on the basis of a dopamine D2-like receptor-mediated evaluation process. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis on the forced swimming test response. The effects of the dopamine D1-like and D2-like receptor antagonists SCH 23390 (0.01–0.04 mg/kg) and raclopride (0.025–0.25 mg/kg) administered before a 15-min exposure to forced swimming, and the response to a second session performed 24 h later, were examined. SCH 23390 dose-dependently reduced climbing scores in the first session and increased them in the second session, but the within-session decline of this measure was similar to that observed in the control group in both sessions. Raclopride-treated subjects showed a slightly reduced level of climbing scores at the beginning of the first session, but persisted in emitting this costly behavioural response up to the end of the session, while no effects were observed in the second session. These results, along with our results examining licking for sucrose, are consistent with the hypothesis that behavioural activation and response effort allocation are directly mediated by dopamine D1-like receptor stimulation, but the level of this activation is updated, or “reboosted”, on the basis of a dopamine D2-like receptor-mediated mechanism of response efficacy evaluation.

Highlights

▸ The effects of dopamine D1 & D2 antagonists were examined in the forced swimming test. ▸ D1 antagonism resulted in a direct reduction of climbing, the most effortful response. ▸ D2 antagonism induced persistently high levels of climbing up to the end of the session. ▸ D1 receptors might be involved in behavioural activation and response effort allocation. ▸ D2 receptors might be involved in the evaluation of response efficacy.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles