aFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, SwitzerlandbQuality of Care Service, University Hospitals of Geneva, SwitzerlandcDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University of Geneva, SwitzerlanddSwiss NCCR “LIVES – Overcoming Vulnerability: Life Course Perspectives”, University of Geneva, SwitzerlandeDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, United KingdomfGeneva School of Economics and Management, University of Geneva, SwitzerlandgLaboratoire LAMHESS, Université Côte d'Azur, FrancehDepartment of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, BelgiumiDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid
Why do individuals fail to exercise regularly despite knowledge of the risks associated with physical inactivity? Automatic processes regulating exercise behaviors may partly explain this paradox. Yet, these processes have only been investigated with behavioral outcomes (i.e., based on reaction times). Here, using electroencephalography, we investigated the cortical activity underlying automatic approach and avoidance tendencies toward stimuli depicting physical activity and sedentary behaviors in 29 young adults who were physically active or physically inactive but with the intention of becoming physically active. Behavioral results showed faster reactions when approaching physical activity compared to sedentary behaviors and when avoiding sedentary behaviors compared to physical activity. These faster reactions were more pronounced in physically active individuals and were associated with changes during sensory integration (earlier onset latency and larger positive deflection of the stimulus-locked lateralized readiness potentials) but not during motor preparation (no effect on the response-locked lateralized readiness potentials). Faster reactions when avoiding sedentary behaviors compared to physical activity were also associated with higher conflict monitoring (larger early and late N1 event-related potentials) and higher inhibition (larger N2 event-related potentials), irrespective of the usual level of physical activity. These results suggest that additional cortical resources were required to counteract an attraction to sedentary behaviors. Data and Materials [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1169140]. Preprint [https://doi.org/10.1101/277988].HighlightsIndividuals are slower at approaching sedentary than physical activity stimuli.Individuals are quicker at avoiding sedentary than physical activity stimuli.These effects are particularly pronounced in physically active individuals.Avoiding sedentary behaviors is associated with high levels of conflict monitoring and inhibition.Additional brain resources are required to escape a general attraction toward sedentary behaviors.