Evaluation of coronary artery disease extent using : comparison of dipyridamole versus exercise and of planar versus tomographic imaging99: comparison of dipyridamole versus exercise and of planar versus tomographic imagingTc: comparison of dipyridamole versus exercise and of planar versus tomographic imagingm: comparison of dipyridamole versus exercise and of planar versus tomographic imaging-sestamibi: comparison of dipyridamole versus exercise and of planar versus tomographic imaging

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Summary

The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of 99Tcm-sestamibi myocardial scintigraphy for the assessment of coronary artery disease extent using two different stresses (exercise and dipyridamole) and imaging techniques (planar versus single photon emission tomography, SPET) in a patient population of 20 subjects, all also studied with coronary angiography. The agreement of exercise and dipyridamole was good for the visual uptake score (planar K=0.71, SPET K=0.64) and for abnormal segment detection (planar and SPET both K=0.76). For the recognition of the individual diseased vessel, the results of exercise and dipyridamole planar scans were equal (sensitivity 49%, specificity 90%, accuracy 63%); those of exercise and dipyridamole SPET were also similar and were both better than the related planar data (sensitivity 79% and 74%, P<0.005 and <0.02, respectively, versus planar; specificity 95% and 100%; accuracy 85 and 83%, P<0.001 and <0.02 versus planar). Both stresses and imaging techniques were less sensitive in cases of mild (50 to 70%) obstructions. In conclusion, exercise and dipyridamole appear equally effective stresses for 99Tcm-sestamibi scintigraphy; with both of them, however, SPET allows significantly better results than planar imaging and therefore should be recommended.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles