1184 A systematic review on measurement techniques of workers’ exposure to nanomaterials in low- and middle- income countries

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Introduction

Nanotechnology expresses great potential as enabling technology but there are still uncertainties about the health risks for workers potentially exposed to nano-objects and their agglomerates and aggregates (NOAA). Different methodological approaches to measure airborne NOAA in the workplace have been proposed. This study finalised a systematic review on this theme with the aim to identify techniques of exposure measurement to be recommended even in contexts with low resources, such as Low- and Middle- Income (LMI) countries.

Materials and methods

We collected scientific papers reporting techniques of NOAA exposure measurements in the workplace and we summarised the data for each eligible technique according to PRISMA guidelines; then we rated the quality of evidence following an adapted GRADE approach.

Results

We found 69 eligible studies to be included in qualitative synthesis: the majority of studies reported a moderate quality and only 2 studies demonstrated the use of a high quality exposure measurement technique. The review demonstrates that a basic exposure measurement, i.e. evidence for the presence or absence of NOAA in the workplace air, can be achieved with moderate (40 techniques) to high quality (2 techniques); 13 of these techniques are defined as comprehensive, since they allow also the quantification of NOAA in the workplace.

Conclusions

This systematic review allowed identifying criteria for a reliable measurement of exposure to NOAA to be recommended in LMI countries. The findings of the study defined a list of requirements that must be fulfilled by an effective measurement technique (either basic or comprehensive), and highlighted the main weaknesses that need to be tackled for an effective affordability evaluation.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles