Early Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Versus Conservative Treatment in Patients With Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials


    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to evaluate the role of early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis, in comparison with conservative treatment.MethodsSystematic review via databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], Latin-American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database, Embase, Cochrane Central, and the [Brazilian] Regional Library of Medicine) is conducted. We analyzed 10 randomized controlled trials (1091 patients). Outcomes were the following: local and systemic adverse events; acute cholangitis; death; length of hospital stay; cost; abdominal pain; and time to a reduction in body temperature. For the meta-analysis, we used risk difference (RD) and mean with standard deviation as measures of variability.ResultsThere was a statistically significant difference between the patients submitted to ERCP in terms of the following: local adverse events (RD, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55–0.99), time to pain relief and time to a reduction in axillary temperature (RD, −5.01; 95% CI, −6.98 to −3.04, and RD, −1.70; 95 CI%, −2.33 to −1.08, respectively). Patients undergoing ERCP spent less time in hospital (RD, −11.04; 95% CI, −15.15 to −6.93). Cost was lower in the group treated with ERCP.ConclusionsEarly ERCP decreases local adverse events, shortening the time to pain relief, to a reduction in axillary temperature, hospital stays, and cost in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis.

    loading  Loading Related Articles