Clonal analysis favours a monoclonal origin for serous borderline tumours with peritoneal implants


    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Serous borderline tumours (SBTs) of the ovary were originally classified as such because the vast majority behave in a remarkably indolent manner, even in the presence of widespread tumour deposits, termed implants, and/or lymph node involvement. The pathogenesis of the implants is currently unknown. Two major hypotheses have been proposed: the first favours a monoclonal origin, arguing that the peritoneal lesions derive from neoplastic cells that are shed from the primary ovarian tumour. The second hypothesis favours a polyclonal origin as a result of a field defect of susceptible Müllerian cells from which multiple independent tumours arise. To test both hypotheses, genome-wide allelotyping andB-RAF/K-RASmutation analyses were employed to assess clonality in 25 metachronous or synchronous tumours from ten SBT patients. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) profiling andK-RAS/B-RAFmutation analysis showed concordance of the genetic changes in all sites in 21 tumours from eight patients who were informative. These results favour a common origin, underscored by a likelihood ratio (probability of common origin/probability of independent origin) ranging from 2.43 to 7 662 850. In conclusion, this study strongly supports the hypothesis that both non-invasive and invasive implants arise as a consequence of spread from a single ovarian site.

    loading  Loading Related Articles