Lead Poisoning Risk Determination in an Urban Population Through the Use of a Standardized Questionnaire.

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Objective

To determine how well the questionnaire identifies children with elevated lead levels.

Setting

A pediatric continuity clinic located in a major teaching hospital in Rochester, NY.

Patients

A consecutive sample of 476 children aged 6 to 72 months without a prior history of lead poisoning who were seen in the clinic in July and August 1992, and who had not had a lead screen in the previous 6 months (for those aged <36 months) or 12 months (for those aged 36 to 72 months).

Measurements and main results

Fingerstick lead samples were obtained from all children, and those >=15 micrograms/dL (0.72 micromole/L) were confirmed by subsequent venous lead determinations. Twenty-eight percent had blood lead levels >=10 micrograms/dL (0.48 micromole/L), 8% had levels >=15 micrograms/dL (0.72 micromole/L), and 5% had lead levels >=20 micrograms/dL (0.96 micromole/L). According to responses on the questionnaire, 44% were initially classified as low-risk, and 43% were high-risk. In 13% risk could not be determined because one or more items on the questionnaire had not been answered or were answered equivocally, whereas all other items were answered "No." Children for whom risk could not be determined were presumed to be at high risk and were added to that category, resulting in 56% of the study population so designated. The questionnaire was moderately effective in identifying children with elevated lead levels. Seventy percent of children having lead levels >=10 micrograms/dL (0.48 micromole/L) and 82% of children having lead levels >=15 micrograms/dL (0.72 micromole/L) had been classified as high-risk by the questionnaire. Children classified as low-risk were very unlikely to have elevated lead levels. Eighty-one percent of low-risk children had lead levels <10 ug/dL, and 97% had lead levels <15 ul/dL. An abbreviated questionnaire using only the first three items from the CDC questionnaire had almost identical effectiveness.

Conclusions

In this clinical setting, in which children are largely urban, poor, and have a moderate to high risk of developing elevated lead levels, the CDC risk assessment questionnaire is effective in identifying children with elevated lead burdens. However, an abbreviated version of the questionnaire may be as effective as the complete questionnaire. Additional questions should be added to the questionnaire to improve its overall sensitivity, and the questionnaire should be tested in other settings to see if it is effective with children having different environmental exposures to lead. Pediatrics 1994;93:159-163; lead, screening, risk determination.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles