Validating computational models: A critique of Anderson's indeterminacy of representation claim

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

It has occasionally been claimed that computational models are underdetermined by behavioral data in a way that is qualitatively different from the usual inductive underdetermination of all scientific theories. The present article takes issue with such claims, which have been gaining some currency, by challenging a particularly explicit version presented by J. R. Anderson (see record 1979-22767-001). It is argued that Anderson's version of the indeterminacy thesis, which is directed at deciding the form of mental representations, rests on 4 assumptions, each of which can be shown to be untenable (and some of which involve mathematical errors). (15 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles