Comparison of two Medication Therapy Management Practice Models on Return on Investment

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the return on investment (ROI) of an integrated practice model versus a “hub and spoke” practice model of pharmacist provided medication therapy management (MTM).

Methods:

A cohort retrospective analysis of MTM claims billed in 76 pharmacies in North Carolina in the 2010 hub and spoke practice model and the 2012 “integrated” practice model were analyzed to calculate the ROI.

Results:

In 2010, 4089 patients received an MTM resulting in 8757 claims in the hub and spoke model. In 2012, 4896 patients received an MTM resulting in 13 730 claims in the integrated model. In 2010, US$165 897.26 was invested in pharmacist salary and $173 498.00 was received in reimbursement, resulting in an ROI of +US$7600.74 (+4.6%). In 2012, US$280 890.09 was invested in pharmacist salary and US$302 963 was received in reimbursement, resulting in an ROI of +US$22 072.91 or (+7.9%).

Conclusion:

The integrated model of MTM showed an increase in number of claims submitted and in number of patients receiving MTM services, ultimately resulting in a higher ROI. While a higher ROI was evident in the integrated model, both models resulted in positive ROI (1:12-1:21), highlighting that MTM programs can be cost effective with different strategies of execution.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles