Critical View of the Myopectineal Orifice
As early as 1995, technical factors such as inadequate mesh size and fixation, and missed hernias were found responsible for most recurrences.2,3 In a multicenter study published in 1998, additional technical errors were identified such as inadequate lateral and medial fixation of the mesh, and missed lipoma of the cord and hernia through a slit mesh.4 More recently, insufficient dissection and overlapping of the myopectineal orifice, lack of parietalization of the elements of the cord, folding of the mesh, and dislocation due to hematoma have also been cited as factors that predispose to recurrence.5,6 The impact of experience on the recurrent rate has been well-documented.5–7 Measures to prevent pain after the endoscopic inguinal hernia repair have been described.8,9 The long learning curve of endoscopic repairs underscores the need for structured teaching and standardization of the procedure.10
The CV of the MPO is defined as the appropriate exposure of the anatomical area that must be attained before placing mesh during laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair by following the steps listed below. The term “CV of safety,” introduced by Strasberg in 1995, is now a standard practice for preventing biliary duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Brian Jacob and the authors of this manuscript agreed to retain the term CV of the MPO and avoid eponyms, which would be unfair to so many who have contributed to the concept. The objective of the CV of the MPO concept is to teach and standardize MIS inguinal hernia repair, facilitate evaluation of videos and live surgery transmissions, reduce recurrences, prevent complications, and ultimately improve patient care.
Implementing the CV of the MPO concept through education and urging its documentation in operative reports will help standardize MIS inguinal hernia repair and facilitate teaching and evaluation of techniques.
The 9 steps to establish a CV of the MPO are as follows:
A video describing the CV of the MPO components during an eTEP repair can be seen at: https://www.facebook.com/jorge.daes/videos/10203676707238837/?l=4600396342676807434/.
In conclusion, the CV of the MPO, a novel concept derived from a social medium platform, is defined as appropriate exposure of the anatomical area that must be attained before placing mesh during endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Many of the CV's components have been taught separately by experts for years and have proved to reduce recurrences and complications. Implementing the CV concept will help standardize a growing variability in laparoscopic and robotic hernia repair, facilitate training, reduce recurrence and complications, and ultimately improve patient care. We propose that CV of the MPO be a prerequisite during MIS hernia repair before mesh implantation and its establishment be duly documented in the operative record. Finally, clinical studies are needed to measure the impact of CV implementation in MIS inguinal hernia repair.