Molecular Mechanism of the “Babysitter” Procedure for Nerve Regeneration and Muscle Preservation in Peripheral Nerve Repair in a Rat Model

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid



To investigate the molecular mechanism of nerve “babysitter” for nerve regeneration and muscle preservation in peripheral nerve repair.


Eighty rats were equalized into 4 groups: peroneal nerve transected, group A received no treatment; group B underwent end-to-end repair; group C underwent end-to-side “babysitter” with donor epineurial window; group D underwent end-to-side “babysitter” with 40% donor neurectomy. During second-stage procedure, end-to-end neurorrhaphies were executed in groups A, C, and D. Expression of Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 in spinal cord and IGF-1, TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), and Fn14 in anterior tibial muscles were evaluated by histopathology at 4-, 8-, 12-, and 24-week timepoints postoperatively.


At 4 weeks, group D expressed comparable IGF-1 with group B, and greater value than groups A and C in spinal cord. By 24 weeks, groups B and D showed higher values than groups A and C. Insulin-like growth factor 1 in muscles were greater in groups C and D than in groups A and B at 4 weeks, and comparable in all groups at 24 weeks. At 4 weeks, immunoreactive scores of TWEAK were 9.00 ± 0, 3.00 ± 0, 6.75 ± 0.75, and 6.75 ± 0.75, respectively. No differences were noticed in all groups by 24 weeks. At 4 weeks, Fn14 were similar in groups A, C, and D, but lower in group B. Group D showed comparable Fn14 with groups B and C, but lower value than group A at 24 weeks.


End-to-side nerve “babysitter” in peripheral nerve could promote fiber regeneration and muscle preservation by regulating expression of IGF-1 and TWEAK-Fn14. End-to-side “babysitter” with partial donor neurectomy could achieve comparable effects with end-to-end repair.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles