A randomized study of pomalidomide vs placebo in persons with myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated myelofibrosis and RBC-transfusion dependence

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

RBC-transfusion dependence is common in persons with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis. The objective of this study was to determine the rates of RBC-transfusion independence after therapy with pomalidomide vs placebo in persons with MPN-associated myelofibrosis and RBC-transfusion dependence. Two hundred and fifty-two subjects (intent-to-treat (ITT) population) including 229 subjects confirmed by central review (modified ITT population) were randomly assigned (2:1) to pomalidomide or placebo. Trialists and subjects were blinded to treatment allocation. Primary end point was proportion of subjects achieving RBC-transfusion independence within 6 months. One hundred and fifty-two subjects received pomalidomide and 77 placebo. Response rates were 16% (95% confidence interval (CI), 11, 23%) vs 16% (8, 26%; P = 0.87). Response in the pomalidomide cohort was associated with ≤ 4 U RBC/28 days (odds ratio (OR) = 3.1; 0.9, 11.1), age ≤ 65 (OR = 2.3; 0.9, 5.5) and type of MPN-associated myelofibrosis (OR = 2.6; 0.7, 9.5). Responses in the placebo cohort were associated with ≤ 4 U RBC/28 days (OR = 8.6; 0.9, 82.3), white blood cell at randomization > 25 × 109/l (OR = 4.9; 0.8, 28.9) and interval from diagnosis to randomization > 2 years (OR = 4.9; 1.1, 21.9). Pomalidomide was associated with increased rates of oedema and neutropenia but these adverse effects were manageable. Pomalidomide and placebo had similar RBC-transfusion-independence response rates in persons with MPN-associated RBC-transfusion dependence.

    loading  Loading Related Articles