Standard Occupational Classification Codes: An Update
In 2007, an opportunity arose to provide input for additional SOC codes. The American Medical Informatics Association’s (AMIA’s) Nursing Informatics Working Group and the Alliance for Nursing Informatics (ANI) submitted a letter requesting an addition to the SOC system to include nursing informatics (NI) as a major group. Without an SOC code, it is difficult to determine how many nurses are working in NI. The workgroup argued:
The request was rejected. While no specific rationale was offered for the decision not to pursue it at a higher level in the Bureau of Labor Statistics, comments suggested that the title could be coded into different areas because of the various roles and work locations associated with NI. For example, a nurse may be working in the capacity of informaticist, but the job title may not reflect those responsibilities. In addition, the submitted definition suggested that an “informatics nurse” was not always in a clinical role, which is accurate.
In 2014, we were given the opportunity to try again—this time as part of a larger multistakeholder informatics effort to obtain SOC codes for a broader group of health informatics professionals. Nursing informatics would be included with other health informatics professionals holding similar roles. The SOC Policy Committee (SOCPC) and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reviewed all the received comments and released initial recommendations in July 2016, requesting comments on those recommendations. The initial recommendations included informatics in a new broad and detailed occupation (299020 and 29-90210) for health information technology (IT), health information management (HIM), and health informatics specialists and analysts. The codes also proposed adding clinical informatics director, chief medical information officer, and health information services manager as examples to the existing code of medical and health services managers (11-911).3
Although the multistakeholder group was enthusiastic about recognition of the distinct field of informatics, AMIA, ANI, and others were disappointed that the codes were combined, and nursing was not included as an example. The first author was asked to serve as liaison from ANI to the AMIA group working on the response to the request for comment, the second author served as her mentor, and the third author represented ANA in the deliberations.
The group gathered information between July 2106 and September 2016 to understand more about the reasoning for the decision of the SOCPC and OMB and determine the best recommendations for change. Our team met with Peter McMenamin, health economist for the American Nurses Association, who was familiar with the history of SOC code development and associated decision-making process. McMenamin reminded the group that SOC codes are used mostly by economists and are collected at the state level by Labor Department offices contacting individual local businesses. Personnel offices of those businesses are provided with information on the definitions of the SOC codes, but job ladders and specific job titles of employees do not always match SOC codes.