Oxidised zirconium: 3D LASER SCANNING OF RETRIEVED POLYETHYLENE INSERTSversus: 3D LASER SCANNING OF RETRIEVED POLYETHYLENE INSERTScobalt alloy bearing surfaces in total knee arthroplasty: 3D LASER SCANNING OF RETRIEVED POLYETHYLENE INSERTS
We sought to establish whether an oxidised zirconium (OxZr) femoral component causes less loss of polyethylene volume than a cobalt alloy (CoCr) femoral component in total knee arthroplasty.Materials and Methods
A total of 20 retrieved tibial inserts that had articulated with OxZr components were matched with 20 inserts from CoCr articulations for patient age, body mass index, length of implantation, and revision diagnosis. Changes in dimensions of the articular surfaces were compared with those of pristine inserts using laser scanning. The differences in volume between the retrieved and pristine surfaces of the two groups were calculated and compared.Results
The loss of polyethylene volume was 122 mm3 (standard deviation (sd) 87) in the OxZr group and 170 mm3 (SD 96) in the CoCr group (p = 0.033). The volume loss in the OxZr group was also lower in the medial (72 mm3 (SD 67)versus92 mm3 (SD 60); p = 0.096) and lateral (49 mm3 (SD 36)versus79 mm3 (SD 61); p = 0.096) compartments separately, but these differences were not significant.Conclusion
Our results corroborate earlier findings fromin vitrotesting and visual retrieval analysis which suggest that polyethylene volume loss is lower with OxZr femoral components. Since both OxZr and CoCr are hard surfaces that would be expected to create comparable amounts of polyethylene creep, the differences in volume loss may reflect differences in thein vivowear of these inserts.