Evaluate application of quality improvement approaches to key ambulatory malpractice risk and safety areas.Study Setting:
In total, 25 small-to-medium-sized primary care practices (16 intervention; 9 control) in Massachusetts.Study Design:
Controlled trial of a 15-month intervention including exposure to a learning network, webinars, face-to-face meetings, and coaching by improvement advisors targeting “3+1” high-risk domains: test result, referral, and medication management plus culture/communication issues evaluated by survey and chart review tools.Data Collection Methods:
Chart reviews conducted at baseline and postintervention for intervention sites. Staff and patient survey data collected at baseline and postintervention for intervention and control sites.Principal Findings:
Chart reviews demonstrated significant improvements in documentation of abnormal results, patient notification, documentation of an action or treatment plan, and evidence of a completed plan (all P<0.001). Mean days between laboratory test date and evidence of completed action/treatment plan decreased by 19.4 days (P<0.001). Staff surveys showed modest but nonsignificant improvement for intervention practices relative to controls overall and for the 3 high-risk domains that were the focus of PROMISES.Conclusions:
A consortium of stakeholders, quality improvement tools, coaches, and learning network decreased selected ambulatory safety risks often seen in malpractice claims.