Use of Simulation to Assess Incoming Interns’ Recognition of Opportunities to Choose Wisely

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Despite increasing healthcare costs, training on cost-consciousness is lacking in graduate medical education (GME). Medical centers must consider how best to incorporate value-based training into their GME curricula.

OBJECTIVE:

To incorporate low-value principles into an existing GME simulation exercise and assess incoming interns’ recognition of low-value care.

METHODS:

Choosing WiselyTM lists were reviewed to identify 4 low-value hazards to be embedded into a simulated hospital room in addition to the 8 patient safety hazards used previously. Interns were given 10 minutes to independently review a mock chart and list all hazards they identified in the simulation. Interns completed a short survey on their prior training in medical school and a follow-up survey one month into internship. T tests used to compare identification of low-value vs safety hazards and to associate performance with prior training.

RESULTS:

The mean percentage of hazards correctly identified was 50.4% (standard deviation [SD] 11.8%). Interns identified significantly fewer low-value hazards (mean 19.2%, SD 18.6%) than safety hazards (mean 66.0%, SD 16.0%; P < .001). For example, while 96% of interns identified the hand hygiene hazard, only 6% identified the unnecessary blood transfusion and none identified the unnecessary stress ulcer prophylaxis. Interns who self-reported as confident in their ability to identify hazards were not any more likely to correctly identify hazards than those who were not confident.

CONCLUSIONS:

The “Room of Horrors” simulation revealed poor awareness of low-value care among interns. The simulation highlights a promising model for the prioritization and inclusion of value-based experiential training in GME.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles