Acute Kidney Injury After PICU: Jumping on Giants’ Shoulders*

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid


William of Baskerville, the wise protagonist of Umberto Eco’s novel The Name of the Rose, has a wonderful conversation with the master glazier at the monastery, Nicholas of Morimondo (whose name could be translated from the Latin, not causally, as “dying world”). Nicholas says about his art: “We no longer have the learning of the ancients, the age of giants is past!” William’s answer is unforgettable: “We are dwarfs, but dwarfs who stand on the shoulders of those giants, and small though we are, we sometimes manage to see farther on the horizon than they.” This popular concept is attributed to Isaac Newton and, before him, back to the 12th century and French philosopher Bernard of Chartres. It is a simple metaphor meaning that even a giant creature, when facing a giant wall, is not able to see the horizon; however, a dwarf on his shoulders could. In scientific literature, a simple and good idea (on the top of a bulky and extensively studied background) might help to provide farther important prognostic information on organ function of surviving critically ill patients.
In this issue of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Hessey et al (1) report the results of a simple and good hypothesis: let us see what happens to the renal function of critically ill children who survive an acute kidney injury (AKI) episode after the PICU discharge but before ultimate hospital dismissal. If AKI in PICU is the giant topic that promoted one of the most remarkable and exciting bursts to critical care literature of the last decade (fortunately, both in the adult and pediatric settings) (2), we currently need to jump onto AKI’s shoulders to look at AKI recovery. Interestingly, even if this issue has been identified as one of the most important priorities of AKI research agenda (3), it has never before attempted to “dwarf” the follow-up soon after PICU discharge. If the findings of this article are interesting, we are left with open questions that are equally surprising. According to the results by Hessey et al (1), among patients who survived PICU and who had at least one serum creatinine (SCr) measurement thereafter, the proportion of children who definitely left the hospital with recovered renal function depended on definition: 92.5% when recovery was defined as SCr less than 1.5 times baseline versus 75.9% when defined as less than 1.15 times baseline. Of 7.5% patients without a complete renal recovery, 2% were children not diagnosed with AKI in the PICU. The independent variables associated with lack of recovery were, at multivariate analyses, oncologic diagnosis and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage 3 AKI (4). With this information in mind, regardless of the astonishing message that between seven and 15 children (or maybe more) of 100 go home with non-normal renal function, we appraise that these results are relative to only 40% of post-PICU patients—those patients who had at least one SCr level measured in the ward. After stratification for AKI diagnosis, about two-thirds of patients with a previous PICU-AKI episode—and less than half the patients without—were sampled with SCr after PICU discharge. Clearly, severity of AKI (according to KDIGO SCr criteria) was proportionally associated with the odds of controlling renal function before hospital discharge; still, incredibly, 10% of patients with stage 3 AKI (those with the highest risk of lacking renal recovery) were not controlled before going home.
Other details of the multiple associations performed by the authors deserve attention.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles