Impact of a quality-assessment dashboard on the comprehensive review of pharmacist performance
The impact of a quality-assessment dashboard and individualized pharmacist performance feedback on the adherence of order verification was evaluated.Methods.
A before-and-after study was conducted at a 1,440-bed academic medical center. Adherence of order verification was defined as orders verified according to institution-derived, medication-related guidelines and policies. Formulas were developed to assess the adherence of verified orders to dosing guidelines using patient-specific height, weight, and serum creatinine clearance values from the electronic medical record at the time of pharmacist verification. A total of 5 medications were assessed by the formulas for adherence and displayed on the dashboard: ampicillin–sulbactam, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin–tazobactam, acyclovir, and enoxaparin. Adherence of order verification was assessed before (May 1–July 31, 2015) and after (November 1, 2015–January 31, 2016) individualized performance feedback was given based on trends identified by the quality-assessment dashboard.Results.
There was a significant increase in the overall adherence rate postintervention (90.1% versus 91.9%, p = 0.040). Among the 34 pharmacists who participated, the percentage of pharmacists with at least 90% overall adherence increased postintervention (52.9% versus 70.6%, p = 0.103). Time to verification was similar before and after the study intervention (median, 6.0 minutes; interquartile range, 3–13 minutes). The rate of documentation for nonadherent orders increased significantly postintervention (57.1% versus 68.5%, p = 0.019).Conclusion.
The implementation of the quality-assessment dashboard, educational sessions, and individualized performance feedback significantly improved pharmacist order-verification adherence to institution-derived, medication-related guidelines and policies and the documentation rate of nonadherent orders.