Information de reference pour ce titreAccession Number: | 00005082-201805000-00015.
|
Author: | Lin, Chung-Ying PhD; Pakpour, Amir H. PhD; Brostrom, Anders PhD; Fridlund, Bengt PhD; Arestedt, Kristofer PhD; Stromberg, Anna PhD; Jaarsma, Tiny PhD; Martensson, Jan PhD
|
Institution: | Chung-Ying Lin, PhD Assitant Professor, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom. Amir H. Pakpour, PhD Associate Professor, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Iran, and Department of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jonkoping University, Sweden. Anders Brostrom, PhD Professor, Department of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jonkoping University, Sweden. Bengt Fridlund, PhD Professor, School of Health and Welfare, Jonkoping University, Sweden. Kristofer Arestedt, PhD Professor, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linkoping University, Sweden. Anna Stromberg, PhD Professor, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linkoping University, Sweden. Tiny Jaarsma, PhD Professor, Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Linkoping University, Sweden; and Mary MacKillop Institute of Health Research, ACU, Melbourne, Australia. Jan Martensson, PhD Professor, Department of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jonkoping University, Sweden.
|
Title: | |
Source: | Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 33(3):281-288, May/June 2018.
|
Abstract: | Background: The 9-item European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior scale (EHFScB-9) is a self-reported questionnaire commonly used to capture the self-care behavior of people with heart failure (HF).
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the EHFScB-9's factorial structure and categorical functioning of the response scale and differential item functioning (DIF) across subpopulations in Iran.
Methods: Patients with HF (n = 380; 60.5% male; mean [SD] age, 61.7 [9.1] years) participated in this study. The median (interquartile range) of the duration of their HF was 6.0 (2.4-8.8) months. Most of the participants were in New York Heart Association classification II (NYHA II, 61.8%); few of them had left ventricular ejection fraction assessment (11.3%). All participants completed the EHFScB-9. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the factorial structure of the EHFScB-9; Rasch analysis was used to analyze categorical functioning and DIF items across 2 characteristics (gender and NYHA).
Results: The 2-factor structure ("adherence to regimen" and "consulting behavior") of the EHFScB-9 was confirmed, and the unidimensionality of each factor was found. Categorical functioning was supported for all items. No items displayed substantial DIF across gender (DIF contrast, -0.25-0.31). Except for item 3 ("Contact doctor or nurse if legs/feet are swollen"; DIF contrast, -0.69), no items displayed substantial DIF across NYHA classes (DIF contrast, -0.40 to 0.47).
Conclusions: Despite the DIF displayed in 1 item across the NYHA classes, the EHFScB-9 demonstrated sound psychometric properties in patients with HF.
Copyright (C) 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved
|
Author Keywords: | confirmatory factor analysis; heart failure; Rasch; self-care behavior scale.
|
References: | 1. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146-e603.
2. Grady KL. Self-care and quality of life outcomes in heart failure patients. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008;23(3):285-292.
3. Clark AM, Savard LA, Spaling MA, Heath S, Duncan AS, Spiers JA. Understanding help-seeking decisions in people with heart failure: a qualitative systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(12):1582-1597.
4. Hwang B, Luttik ML, Dracup K, Jaarsma T. Family caregiving for patients with heart failure: types of care provided and gender differences. J Card Fail. 2010;16(5):398-403.
5. McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(14):1787-1847.
6. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(27):2129-2200.
7. Bahrami M, Etemadifar S, Shahriari M, Farsani AK. Caregiver burden among Iranian heart failure family caregivers: a descriptive, exploratory, qualitative study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014;19(1):56-63.
8. Riegel B, Jaarsma T, Stromberg A. A middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2012;35(3):194-204.
9. Riegel B, Lee CS, Dickson VV, Carlson B. An update on the self-care of heart failure index. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009;24(6):485-497.
10. Buck HG, Lee CS, Moser DK, et al. Relationship between self-care and health-related quality of life in older adults with moderate to advanced heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2012;27(1):8-15.
11. Lee CS, Moser DK, Lennie TA, Tkacs NC, Margulies KB, Riegel B. Biomarkers of myocardial stress and systemic inflammation in patients who engage in heart failure self-care management. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;26(4):321-328.
12. Vellone E, Riegel B, Cocchieri A, et al. Psychometric testing of the self-care of heart failure index version 6.2. Res Nurs Health. 2013;36(5):500-511.
13. Jaarsma T, Stromberg A, Martensson J, Dracup K. Development and testing of the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale. Eur J Heart Fail. 2003;5(3):363-370.
14. Jaarsma T, Arestedt KF, Martensson J, Dracup K, Stromberg A. The European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour scale revised into a nine-item scale (EHFScB-9): a reliable and valid international instrument. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009;11(1):99-105.
15. Sedlar N, Socan G, Farkas J, et al. Measuring self-care in patients with heart failure: a review of the psychometric properties of the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale (EHFScBS). Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(7):1304-1313.
16. Lee CS, Lyons KS, Gelow JM, et al. Validity and reliability of the European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale among adults from the United States with symptomatic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013;12(2):214-218.
17. Lambrinou E, Kalogirou F, Lamnisos D, et al. The Greek version of the 9-item European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale: a multidimensional or a uni-dimensional scale? Heart Lung. 2014;43(6):494-499.
18. Vellone E, Jaarsma T, Stromberg A, et al. The European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale: new insights into factorial structure, reliability, precision and scoring procedure. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94(1):97-102.
19. Ostergaard B, Mahrer-Imhof R, Lauridsen J, Wagner L. Validity and reliability of the Danish version of the 9-item European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale. Scand J Caring Sci. 2017;31(2):405-412.
20. Li CH. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods. 2016;48(3):936-949.
21. Lin CY, Burri A, Fridlund B, Pakpour AH. Female sexual function mediates the effects of medication adherence on quality of life in people with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;67:60-65.
22. Chang CC, Su JA, Tsai CS, Yen CF, Liu JH, Lin CY. Rasch analysis suggested three unidimensional domains for Affiliate Stigma Scale: additional psychometric evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(6):674-683.
23. Gregorich SE. Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Med Care. 2006;44(11 suppl 3):S78-S94.
24. Brodersen J, Meads D, Kreiner S, Thorsen H, Doward L, McKenna S. Methodological aspects of differential item functioning in the Rasch model. J Med Econ. 2007;10:309-324.
25. Tennant A, Penta M, Tesio L, et al. Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: the PRO-ESOR project. Med Care. 2004;42(1 suppl):I37-I48.
26. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-3191.
27. Harris-Kojetin LD, Fowler FJ Jr, Brown JA, Schnaier JA, Sweeny SF. The use of cognitive testing to develop and evaluate CAHPS 1.0 core survey items. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study. Med Care. 1999;37(suppl 3):MS10-MS21.
28. Gadermann AM, Guhn M, Zumbo BD. Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: a conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2012;17(3):1-13.
29. Cheng C-P, Luh W-M, Yang A-L, Su C-T, Lin C-Y. Agreement of children and parents scores on Chinese version of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0: further psychometric development. Appl Res Qual Life. 2016;11:891-906.
30. Muthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus User's Guide. 2nd ed. Authors: Los Angeles, CA; 2001.
31. Tsai MC, Strong C, Lin CY. Effects of pubertal timing on deviant behaviors in Taiwan: a longitudinal analysis of 7th- to 12th-grade adolescents. J Adolesc. 2015;42:87-97.
32. Wright BD, Linacre JM. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measure Transact. 1994;8:370.
33. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S. Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection Americans Investigators. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(7):950-963.
34. Jafari P, Bagheri Z, Ayatollahi SMT, Soltani Z. Using Rasch rating scale model to reassess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the PedsQL(TM) 4.0 Generic Core Scales in school children. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:27.
35. Shih C-L, Wang W-C. Differential item functioning detection using the multiple indicators, multiple causes method with a pure short anchor. Appl Psychol Measur. 2009;33:184-199.
36. Rosseel Y, Oberski D, Byrnes J, et al. Package 'lavaan'. 2017. https://cran.r-project.org/web/p...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre. Accessed May 31, 2017.
37. Revelle W. Package 'psych'. 2017. https://cran.r-project.org/web/p...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre. Accessed May 31, 2017.
38. Andrich D, Hagquist C. Real and artificial differential item functioning. J Educ Behav Stat. 2012;37(3):387-416.
|
Language: | English.
|
Document Type: | ARTICLES: Instrument Adaptation.
|
Journal Subset: | Clinical Medicine.
|
ISSN: | 0889-4655
|
NLM Journal Code: | jcn, 8703516
|
DOI Number: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre
|
Annotation(s) | |
|
|