A comparison of intracoronary treatment strategies for thrombus burden removal during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a COCTAIL II substudy
Manual thrombus aspiration and local drug delivery of abciximab have been proposed as a strategy to reduce thrombus burden during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction; however, the effectiveness of these approaches, is uncertain. In this COCTAIL II substudy, we compared the effect of these strategies on prestenting and poststenting thrombus burden assessed by optical coherence tomography.Patients and methods
COCTAIL II trial enrolled patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction randomized to intralesion (IL, by the ClearWay catheter) versus intracoronary (IC, by the guide catheter) abciximab bolus with or without aspiration thrombectomy (AT). The following parameters were used to quantify atherothrombotic burden: thrombus volume (TVol), maximum thrombus area (TA), and thrombus burden (TB). Primary endpoint was the comparison of prestenting TVol after the use of local drug delivery (group IL+IL abciximab plus AT) versus nonlocal drug delivery (group IC abciximab plus AT+IC).Results
The final population consisted of 59 patients undergoing both prestenting and poststenting optical coherence tomography assessment. The amount of thrombus was not significantly different in the groups with local drug delivery of abciximab versus nonlocal drug delivery in both prestenting (TVol: 18.87±26.70 vs. 19.02±18.45; TB: 26.73±12.8 vs. 25.18±13.25; and maximum TA: 59.25±18.84 vs. 53.34±19.30) and poststenting (TVol: 8.46±9.15 vs. 8.05±6.81; TB: 6.68±3.54 vs. 6.24±3.66; and maximum TA: 15.47±7.61 vs. 16.52±11.55) evaluations. A good correlation between thrombus measurements after thrombus removal techniques and intrastent thrombus was observed.Conclusion
Either local drug delivery of abciximab or manual thrombus aspiration showed comparable results in terms of prestenting and poststenting thrombus burden removal.