Estimands: A More Strategic Approach to Study Design and Analysis

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Excerpt

The ultimate goal of drug development is to bring new therapies to patients. This requires a profound understanding of the benefits and risks associated with a new treatment. Sir Austin Bradford Hill1 was the first modern researcher to conduct a randomized clinical trial (RCT), see the 1948 landmark paper1 entitled “Streptomycin Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis.” Since then, RCTs have become the gold standard in clinical trials. Why is this the case?
An RCT is a scientific experiment that is conducted to allow a fair comparison between different treatment arms. We assign patients randomly to receive the different treatments under investigation. This random assignment serves to create balanced groups in terms of measured and unmeasured background characteristics, such that any differences observed after randomization are expected to be due to assigning patients to the randomized treatments irrespective of compliance and adherence.
In order to conclude that the differences between the treatment arms observed after randomization are due to taking the assigned treatments, we require, in addition, that patients take their treatment throughout the course of the study. However, in clinical studies and practice, events may occur that prevent patients from taking their treatment for the intended duration (e.g., adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation). These events, which are also referred to as intercurrent2 events, occur after randomization, and may themselves be treatment‐related. The more such intercurrent events occur, the less certain we can be that differences observed after randomization are due to taking the randomized treatments.
    loading  Loading Related Articles