Institution of Just Culture Physician Peer Review in an Academic Medical Center
For academic medical centers to improve quality outcomes, identification and optimization of opportunities for improvement are necessary. Effective clinical peer review frequently has limitations on timeliness, transparency, and consideration of system processes related to untoward clinical outcomes. We developed a process to overcome these barriers and capture opportunities for process improvement identified within the clinical peer review system.Methods
A multidisciplinary committee was formed to evaluate the current process of physician peer review at Magee Womens Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Evaluation of current peer review triggers, processes, communication, transparency, and actionable outcomes was performed. A new approach was established that incorporated a protected electronic portal to improve communication and provider engagement, as well as initiation of a Just Culture peer review algorithm to realize opportunities for system improvements.Results
The new process has been operative for 2 years. After initiation, the average time necessary for full case review decreased by 66% (6–2 months). Provider engagement and input have increased to 71%, from less than 10% before implementation. Most cases (51%) were identified as having more than one causative factor, with systems issues being the most frequent contributor to untoward outcomes.Conclusions
Given the recognized benefits, this approach is being considered for implementation on a broader scale within service-line quality initiatives across the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center health system. Although first implemented among faculty, consideration of incorporation into graduate medical education programs is ongoing.