The financial impact regarding choice of physician within the workers’ compensation domain has not been well studied.Objective:
The aim of this study was to assess the difference in claim cost between employee- and employer-directed choice of treating physician after injury.Methods:
Thirty-five thousand six hundred forty indemnity lost time claims from a 13-year period at a nationwide company were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression to determine the association of medical direction with risk of high-cost claims.Results:
States that have employer-directed physician choice were associated with a lower risk of having high-cost claims (≥$50,000) but higher attorney involvement than employee direction. The net effect of this enhanced presence of attorneys offsets the benefits of employer choice of treating physician.Conclusion:
States that permit employer selection of treating physician have slightly higher cost due to the higher prevalence of attorney involvement in the claims process.