Addition of Nasal Cannula Can Either Impair or Enhance Preoxygenation With a Bag Valve Mask: A Randomized Crossover Design Study Comparing Oxygen Flow Rates

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid


BACKGROUND:A critical safety component of emergency anesthesia is the avoidance of hypoxemia during the apneic phase of a rapid sequence intubation. Preoxygenation with a bag valve mask (BVM) or anesthetic circuit may be improved with supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula (NC) if there is a mask leak. In addition, NC is recommended for apneic oxygenation after induction and may be placed before preoxygenation. However, the optimum NC flow rate for preoxygenation or whether the presence of NC alone creates a mask leak remains unclear.METHODS:We performed a randomized crossover study on healthy volunteers comparing BVM alone and BVM with NC flow rates of 0 (NC-0), 5 (NC-5), 10 (NC-10), and 15 (NC-15) liters per minute (lpm). Our primary outcome was end-tidal oxygen (ETO2) after 3-minute preoxygenation.RESULTS:There was no difference in ETO2 between NC-15, NC-10, or BVM-only at 3 minutes. NC-0 and NC-5 recorded significantly lower ETO2 at all times compared with NC-15, NC-10, or BVM-only (least difference NC-5, −7% [95% confidence interval {CI}, −4% to −10%), NC-0, 16% [95% CI, 13%–19%]). There was a difference in ETO2 between NC-15 and BVM-only at 1 minute (7%; 95% CI, 5%–9%), but not at 2 or 3 minutes. There was no difference in ETO2 between NC-10 and NC-15.CONCLUSIONS:Our study found that NC at 0 and 5 lpm with a BVM is deleterious to preoxygenation and should be avoided. In addition, a lack of difference between NC-10 and BVM-only demonstrates that NC at flows of at least 10 lpm should not impair the preoxygenation process. While NC-15 may offer a benefit by reaching maximal ETO2 at 1 minute, this would need to be balanced against patient comfort.

    loading  Loading Related Articles