COMPARISON OF TOPICAL ANESTHESIA AND PERIBULBAR ANESTHESIA FOR 23-GAUGE VITRECTOMY WITHOUT SEDATION

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Purpose:

To compare the safety and efficacy of topical anesthesia versus peribulbar anesthesia for 23-gauge vitrectomy without sedation.

Methods:

Selected group of 60 patients with vitreous hemorrhage were divided into 2 groups and underwent 23-gauge vitrectomy. Group 1 used topical anesthesia, whereas Group 2 used peribulbar anesthesia. A 5-point Visual Analogue Scale was used to assess patients' pain score and surgeon's ease while operating. Any complications thereof were made note of.

Results:

Mean overall patients' pain scores were 1.77 ± 0.50 in Group 1 and 1.77 ± 0.43 in Group 2. Surgeon's comfort score was recorded as 0.3 ± 0.53 and 0.17 ± 0.38 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Mean surgical time was 33.7 ± 7.1 minutes and 30.1 ± 6.2 minutes in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. These means were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). No patient required sedation or anesthesia supplementation. Group 1 patients reported maximum pain during trocar entry, whereas Group 2 reported maximum pain during block. Group 2 patients also reported significant conjunctival chemosis and lid edema postblock.

Conclusion:

Topical anesthesia without any sedation is a viable option, comparable to peribulbar block, for performing vitrectomy in selected group of patients requiring vitrectomy and thus avoiding complication of injection anesthesia and quicker postoperative recovery.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles