Comparison of joint destruction between standard- and low-dose etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis from the Prevention of Cartilage Destruction by Etanercept (PRECEPT) study

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the prevention of joint destruction and clinical efficacy of low-dose etanercept (ETN) (25 mg/week) compared with standard-dose ETN (50 mg/week) in RA.

Methods. In this prospective, randomized, open-label study, 70 patients were assigned to receive ETN at either 50 or 25 mg/week for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the variation in modified total Sharp score (mTSS), and secondary endpoints were variations in disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS-28), modified HAQ and adverse event rate. Values of mTSS were calculated at baseline and after 52 weeks. Non-progression was estimated as ΔmTSS ≤0.5, and the non-progression rate was compared between groups.

Results. Mean values at baseline were as follows: disease duration 9.2 years; DAS-28 5.45; and annual progression of mTSS 26.1. No significant differences in background were seen between groups. At 52 weeks, the non-progression rate was significantly less in the 25 mg/week group (36.7%) than in the 50 mg/week group (67.7%) (P = 0.041). Mean ΔmTSS was higher at 25 mg/week (1.03) than at 50 mg/week (−0.13). DAS-28 was significantly improved at 4 weeks, and the effect of treatment lasted for 52 weeks in both groups. No differences in adverse event rates were seen between groups.

Conclusion. Low-dose ETN is not inferior to standard-dose ETN in terms of effects on clinical manifestations. However, in terms of the radiographic non-progression rate, the effects of low-dose ETN may be inferior to the effects of standard-dose ETN.

Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/, UMIN000001798.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles