Predictors of Distal Adding-on in Thoracic Major Curves With AR Lumbar Modifiers

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Study Design.

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

Objective.

To determine whether the last substantially touched vertebra (LSTV) is a valid lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) for both Lenke 1 and 2 curve patterns with AR lumbar modifiers, and to identify preoperative risk factors of distal adding-on.

Summary of Background Data.

Previous studies have recommended selecting the LSTV as the LIV for Lenke 1AR curves (main thoracic curve with A lumbar modifier and L4 tilt to the right (thoracic overhang/King type IV curve).

Methods.

One-hundred sixty patients with a Lenke 1 or 2 curve pattern and AR lumbar modifier who underwent posterior spinal fusion between 2008 and 2012 were reviewed. All patients had minimum 2-year follow up. Patients were identified with distal adding-on between first erect radiographs and 2-year follow up based on previously defined parameters. Factors predictive of the adding-on phenomenon were identified in a multivariate binary logistic regression model.

Results.

Twenty-seven patients (17%) were identified as having distal adding-on of their primary thoracic curve; however, only 8 of 89 patients (9%) fused to the LSTV developed adding-on (P = 0.005). Three variables were found to be significant predictors of adding-on: LIV proximal to LSTV (odds ratio, OR 3.63; P = 0.01), Risser zero (OR 4.93; P = 0.02), and C7-CSVL distance <2 cm (OR 3.97; P = 0.01). The risk of adding-on increased as the number of predictors increased from 16% with one risk factor to 80% when all three preoperative risk factors were present (P < 0.001).

Conclusion.

Choosing the LSTV as the LIV in Lenke 1 and 2 curve patterns with an AR lumbar modifier significantly decreases the risk of distal adding-on. Skeletally immature patients, those fused short of LSTV, and those with relative coronal balance preoperatively are at increased risk of distal adding-on between the initial postoperative visit and 2-year follow up.

Conclusion.

Level of Evidence: 4

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles