Abstract TP51: When Can Aspects be Read Reliably?

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Introduction: Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) is a systematic approach to assess early ischemic change on non-contrast CT (NCCT). Concerns have however been expressed about its reliability when making clinical decisions in patients with acute ischemic stroke. We chose to systematically assess technical, environmental and patient specific variables that potentially affect ASPECTS interpretation.

Methods: We randomly selected 150 patients with acute ischemic stroke from the PRoveIT database. All patients had baseline NCCT and CT angiography head and neck. Three raters (expert, fellow and trainee) read ASPECTS on the same NCCT three times (Sessions 1-3) at minimum interval of 10-14 days. Raters were kept blinded to follow-up data throughout the study. No baseline clinical information was provided in Session 1. Raters were provided clinical information (age, baseline NIHSS and side of stroke) in session 2 and additional multiphase CTA in session 3. Reading environment [room light and time pressure (<60 s for interpretation) vs. core lab] was altered during readings. Data on motion artifact, leukoaraiosis, old infarcts on NCCT were collected. Time taken for ASPECTS interpretation was collected across all the readings. Reliability was assessed using Intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: The highest inter-rater reliability was found in session 3 (ICC 0.47; p<0.001). The rest of the analyses was restricted to session 3. Reliability in session 3 was not affected by time pressure or ambient light settings (all p<0.01). In session 3, patient motion (ICC 0.35 present vs. 0.49 absent) and old infarcts (ICC 0.42 present vs. 0.48 absent) worsened reliability; however presence of leukoaraiosis did not affect reliability (ICC 0.48 present vs. 0.46 absent). Mean time for ASPECT interpretation by trainee, fellow and expert were 38.9 s (+/-12.8s), 49.8 s (+/-15.4s) and 38.9 s (+/-14s) respectively.

Conclusion: ASPECTS interpretation on NCCT is most reliable when clinical and CTA information is available. Interpretation with this information is reliable even in a well-lit room and under time pressure, the environment that mimics real life acute stroke.

Related Topics

    loading  Loading Related Articles