Twelve-Week Rifapentine Plus Isoniazid Versus 9-Month Isoniazid for the Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis in Renal Transplant Candidates

    loading  Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid


BackgroundRenal transplant candidates (RTC) with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) are at significant risk for tuberculosis reactivation. Twelve-week rifapentine (RPT)/isoniazid (INH) is effective for LTBI but clinical experience in RTC is scarce.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of RTC with LTBI treated with either 12-week RPT/INH or 9-month INH from March 1, 2012, through February 28, 2014. We evaluated both groups for differences in rates of treatment completion, monthly follow-up visit compliance, transaminase elevations, and adverse reactions leading to discontinuation of LTBI treatment. The utility of weekly reminders was also evaluated in the 12-week regimen. Direct observed therapy was not performed in our study.ResultsOf 153 patients, 43 (28%) and 110 (72%) were started on 12-week RPT/INH and 9-month INH, respectively. The treatment completion and monthly follow-up visit compliance rates were higher in the 12-week RPT/INH group (40 [93%] vs 52 [47%], P < 0.001) and (11/40 [28%] vs 13/104 [13%], P = 0.03), respectively. Transaminase elevations were not observed in the RPT/INH group, but occurred in 6 (5%) of the INH group. There were no differences in adverse reactions leading to discontinuation of LTBI treatment.ConclusionsTwelve-week RPT/INH appears to be an excellent choice for LTBI in RTC. It has a higher treatment completion rate and causes less transaminase elevations, and weekly reminders may be an alternative when direct observed therapy is not feasible.

    loading  Loading Related Articles