|| Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid
Improving outcomes have promoted utilization of intensive care for premature infants in developing countries with available fiscal and technological resources. Physician counseling and decision-making have not been characterized where economic restrictions, governmental guidelines, and physician cultural attitudes may influence decisions about the appropriateness of neonatal intensive care. A cross-sectional survey of all neonatologists and pediatricians providing neonatal care in public and private hospitals in South Africa (n=394) was carried out. Physicians returned 93 surveys (24 per cent response rate). Frequency of counseling increased with increasing gestational age (GA) but was not universally provided at any GA. Morbidity and mortality were consistently discussed and fiscal considerations frequently discussed when antenatal counseling occurred. Resuscitation thresholds were 25–26 weeks and 665–685 g, and were higher in public than in private hospitals. Decisions to limit resuscitation were based more on expected outcome than on patients' wishes or economics. At 24–25 weeks, 91 per cent of physicians would not resuscitate despite parents' wishes; 93 per cent of physicians would resuscitate 28–29-week-old infants over parents' refusal. Parents expecting premature infants are not invariably counseled. In making life-support decisions, physicians consider infants' best interests and, less frequently, financial and emotional burdens. Thresholds for resuscitation and intensive care are higher in public hospitals, and higher than in developed countries. Physicians relegate parents to a passive role in life-support decisions.